Let’s Move Seattle Towards a New Waterfront Urbanism

July 20th, 2010

(And that’s all waterfronts, not just the one downtown!)
by Andy Fenstermacher

There are some aspects of Seattle’s physical character that are undeniable: trees, hilly terrain, mountain views, and lengthy fresh- and saltwater coastlines. Each one is embraced and honored to a different extent. Yet, I’ve come to realize that the people of Seattle (average residents and policymakers alike) have yet to fully grasp and appreciate the importance of the city’s extensive waterfronts.

Seattle has over 200 miles of shoreline. As a point of comparison, Tacoma has about 40 miles and San Francisco has about 30 miles of shoreline. And not only does Seattle have tremendous shorelines in terms of quantity, it also has the good fortune of being adjacent to both Puget Sound and Lake Washington.

It’s not that Seattle has totally ignored its shorelines. There are many important protective regulations in place and there are some successful waterfront hotspots like Golden Gardens, Alki and the houseboat communities. But have we really done everything we can or should do to maximize the value of our shorelines? Maybe it’s time to get inspired and do something thinking about the ecology, economy, and social value of Seattle’s waterfronts.

Check out the images below for some Swedish examples of dynamic waterfronts:

  • Share/Bookmark

Urban Infill with Alley Flats

July 7th, 2010

by Lucia Athens

One of our pressing sustainability planning problems is how to increase density in our cities without it becoming the dreaded “D-word” that some people seem to think it is. Density in downtown cores will naturally include high-rises. But density can also be increased in existing neighborhoods without significantly impacting the “feel” and building height of the community. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Monitoring China’s impact on the environment

June 29th, 2010

With so many products sold in the U.S. being manufactured in China, it is exciting to hear a step is being taken to combat the severity of China’s global impact on the environment. 

 

Read Penny Bonda’s article at Interior Design Magazine.

  • Share/Bookmark

Gulf Coast Spill – How you can help

June 28th, 2010

These organizations are leading the efforts to clean up the mess and save the Gulf Coast wildlife:


Cleanup
• Deepwater Horizon Unified Command, 866.448.5816  www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com
• www.volunteerlouisiana.gov

• Mississippi:  www.mcvs.org
• www.Volunteerflorida.org
• www.servealabama.gov

Wildlife Rescue
• www.Sierraclub.org
• www.Audubon.org
• National Wildlife Federation, text “WILDLIFE”, to 20222 to donate $10. www.nwf.org/oilspill

  • Share/Bookmark

Fuel for thought….

June 21st, 2010

by Kesha Stark

What’s amazing to me is that, despite advanced technology that can produce cars with 30-50 mpg and even much higher, many cars we drive today actually get fewer miles per gallon than cars did in the 1970’s.  The average fuel economy in the United States is a shockingly low 20.2 miles per gallon.  (In Europe, that number is 35.)  One reason for this poor average is that we’re driving SUV’s and big trucks, which average 18 mpg.  Compare that to a 2007 Honda Civic, which gets 33 mpg on the highway and 26 in the city.

Let’s do the math.  Say gasoline costs $2.75 per gallon and you drive 15,000 miles a year.  If your car gets 35 mpg, you’d spend $884 less on gasoline every year than if it got 20 mpg.  Invest that savings at an 8 percent rate of return and in 10 years you will have saved almost $14,000.  In 20 years, you’ll have almost $44,000 and in 30 years you’ll have amassed more than $108,000.  Maybe it’s time for a trade- in?

Find out what mileage you are currently getting.  Visit www.epa.gov/greenvehicles  to look up your car model and see its highway and city fuel economy.

Find a greener car.  At www.greenercars.org  check out the listings of “greenest” cars (as well as the “meanest” ones).

  • Share/Bookmark

Cities: They Are What They Eat

June 15th, 2010

by Sean Keithly

In his 2000 landmark book, The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell analyzes the process through which transformative ideas effect change over time - gaining momentum until they reach a point of critical mass and are adopted on a large scale. Trends such as green building and alternative energy are examples of ideas that have gained momentum over the past decade and which are clearly headed on a path for large-scale adoption. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

What will census 2010 say about recent development in Seattle?

June 1st, 2010

Census 2010 is wrapping up, and personally, I can’t wait to see what the data will say about the last 10 years of development in Seattle. As an illustration, I made a map of the Census blocks in my neighborhood and highlighted the ones with less than 20 residents (shown in tan) according to the 2000 Census. Then I marked buildings constructed in the past 10 years which will show up in the Census for the first time in 2010.

At quick glance, I turned up over 500 new residential units (which could easily represent 700 or 800 individual residents); lots of new people in exactly the kind of neighborhood suited to sustainable development. This is definitely an indication of progress in the right direction.

  • Share/Bookmark

Existing Buildings are the Key to a Healthy “Funk Factor”

May 25th, 2010

By Lucia Athens

Why shouldn’t saving existing buildings have the same glamour as designing something totally new? Not only do existing buildings often hold the keys to our past, but renovating these assets to extend their useful life is one of the most sustainable building activities we can do.

Of course, there are challenges, such as how we bring older buildings up to modern standards of energy efficiency. Particularly in the case of historically landmarked buildings that have stringent aesthetic requirements, this can be a challenge. That’s a big part of the reason behind the new Green Preservation Lab, an initiative of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The Trust entered into a historic agreement with the City of Seattle to host the first such lab in Seattle.  The Trust’s mission is perhaps best illustrated by the story of one historical Seattle building that nearly saw the wrecking ball instead of its current preservation and renovation.

Some buildings that one would assume are historically landmarked are not. Due to rather bizarre legislation of the Washington State Supreme Court, property owned by churches is exempt from historic preservation requirements. The First United Methodist Church in Seattle was slated for the wrecking ball. This 100-year-old building includes a terra cotta domed sanctuary and a huge historic organ. I used to be able to see the building out my office window when I worked for the City, and frankly, it was one of the few graceful buildings in the neighborhood. Due to the tireless efforts of Diane Sugimura, the Director of Seattle’s Department of Planning and Development, Daniels Development was able to acquire the property and save the church as part of its overall development plan that includes a high rise on the other portion of the property. The church hall is now called “Daniels Recital Hall” and is used for special events. The project’s motto:  “Sustainability Begins with Preservation” is highly-visible to all passersby.

The fate of First United Methodist Church begs the question: when we look at redevelopment of existing urban areas, how do we maintain a sense of the past? Even if the buildings are not historically designated, they may be worth retaining. I recently visited the offices of Cannon Design Powerhouse in St. Louis. This LEED® Gold building was formerly a steam plant, located not too far from the St. Louis arch. The 1926 building had been vacant for 25 years, and was slated for demolition. Cannon Design, an architecture firm, bought the building and renovated its 19,000 square feet as their headquarters, including a three-story interior gallery and rooftop penthouse.

Cannon Design LEED Gold Offices
Cannon Design LEED Gold Offices, adaptive reuse of an old Steam Plant, St. Louis

Renovating such existing industrial building stock can add a lot of character to redevelopment projects where replacing everything with brand new development runs the risk of being bland and devoid of what I call the “funk factor.” The flavor and aliveness of some neighborhoods is partly due to extensive adaptive reuse, such as the Pearl District of Portland. The  Capitol Hill neighborhood has been experiencing some recent revitalization centered around the Oddfellows Hall building, Cal Anderson Park, and the recent relocation of Elliott Bay Books to the area. The vibe is a cross between the Pearl District and San Francisco’s North Beach area.
Another way to layer on the “funk factor” to street life is to allow for unpredictable messiness with the addition of street artists and street vendors. Portland has a lively food cart program in their downtown. Seattle has been struggling to get something like this up and running but has recently made some progress with some pilot food cart areas. See Mark Hinshaw’s editorial and this article in The Stranger.
This image shows a food cart in an empty block of South Austin. Note the completely bland building façade in the background and imagine this photo without the vendor carts. Can you say flavorless? Do you have any other ideas about how to maintain or create the “funk factor?”
South Austin Cupcake Vendor
South Austin Cupcake Vendor, other Food vendors in background

  • Share/Bookmark

Floating Buildings Responding to Climate Change and Creating New Prototypes for Sustainable Design

May 17th, 2010

by Sean Keithly

There is a sea change quietly taking place in waterfront development.  Cities and other public entities are beginning to pay heed to the Earth’s warming climate and think proactively about how to respond to this change.  In what could be as important an evolution in urban development as the ascendance of the high-rise building, floating structures are emerging as a new future development paradigm.

Of course, the concept of floating structures is nothing new – early examples were born of their contextual necessity or practicality, including floating fishing villages and floating logging camps built upon fallen timber.  In modern cities, floating structures including residential buildings, offices, restaurants, public spaces, and infrastructure have been a relatively common form of development along waterfront areas.  Now, the prospect of rising sea levels initiated by climate change is bringing about the need to re-examine the idea of floating development in ways that are not only practical and cost-effective, but also sensitive to their context environment and integrated with natural systems.  The future of floating buildings may be in full-scale, complete communities – and an important part of a development strategy for areas prone to sea-level rise. 

Public entities and private companies alike are working to craft such a strategy, especially in areas susceptible to the effects of climate change.  One such collaborative, backed by Brad Pitt’s Make it Right Foundation and in partnership with UCLA’s Department of Architecture and Urban Design, has developed a pre-fabricated, modular, floatable house that normally sits on dry land, but can securely rise up to 12 feet in flood events.  Attractive, affordable, and ecologically-friendly, the new units have an estimated cost of $150,000 and are on track to reach a LEED-Platinum® rating.  The prototype was developed in response to the devastation of New Orleans neighborhoods wrought by Hurricane Katrina; scientists have predicted that such natural disasters may become more frequent in years to come as a result of changing climate patterns.

In another example, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, is an area especially susceptible to sea-level rise and is actively investing in climate-change resilient buildings.  The Rotterdam Floating Pavilion is currently being built to showcase the city’s advances in water management and sustainable living.  The structure will be a prominent feature on the city’s waterfront and composed of three distinctive half-spheres each rising nearly 40 feet.  The pavilion will be built using sustainable materials, including a transparent foil that is approximately 100 times lighter than glass.  The building’s heating and air-conditioning systems are entirely renewable, using solar energy for heat and surface water for cooling.

Many more “floating city” concepts are appearing around the world, largely in response to climate change.  Floating development can provide an exciting new context and a host of new opportunities for waterfront areas in cities confronted with the threats of climate change.  The challenge (and opportunity) is to do this in an eminently sustainable way, creating new prototypes for integrating buildings, infrastructure, and the natural environment.

  • Share/Bookmark

Good news Seattle!

April 27th, 2010

by Andy Fenstermacher

Good news Seattle! The city has been ranked the 2nd least wasteful city in the U.S. The information was released as part of Nalgene’s 2nd Annual Least Wasteful Cities Study (http://www.leastwastefulcities.com/study.html). The findings are not surprising given the relatively aggressive environmental policies in the Seattle area, such as those that require food/yard waste service for single-family homes (link). If Seattle plans to overtake San Francisco for 1st place next year it looks like some improvement is needed in transit use and reducing driving for short trips.

Here are the categories where Seattle ranked 1st in the study:

  • 1st Throwing out less than 2 bags of trash each week
  • 1st Using reusable bottles in place of single-serve bottles of water/soda/other beverages
  • 1st Buying bulk food to avoid extra packaging
  • 1st Avoid buying bottled water
  • 1st Buying locally grown/produced foods
  • 1st Composting fruits and vegetable scraps
  • 1st Using reusable grocery bags
  • 1st Reusing wrapping paper and ribbons
  • 1st Borrowing books from the library (or buying used) rather than buying them new
  • 1st Turning off the water when brushing their teeth

Be sure to visit the link above to check out the full list.

Least Wasteful Cities

  • Share/Bookmark