We have the technology today to achieve net zero energy and water use and consumption. We have the tools right now to use existing technologies to improve functionality of new green development.
With vision, forethought and analysis, we can improve lives, future proof development, and help the environment. When we do this we save money immediately and over the life of the project.
Current Performance |
Alternative Performance |
| Meet energy code | Net zero energy with onsite generation (or) exceed energy code by 50% or 70% or 100% |
| Meet water code | Net zero water use |
| Extend combined sewers | Net zero wastewater |
| Install storm water ponds | Zero runoff |
| Install least cost electric resistance heaters |
District energy system with warm/cool water piped system to off-load electric load |
| No maximization of daylighting | Daylighting maximized |
| Air conditioning | Natural ventilation |
| Landscaping for aesthetics only | Landscaping optimized for cooling and stormwater |
| Conventional transportation | Integration of electric cars |
| Conventional waste disposal | Zero waste |
What is first cost/life cycle costs/return on investments of current practice vs. alternatives?
How much electricity could be conserved, avoided, or generated onsite?
What is the range of values of the savings?
How sensitive are these results to different assumptions about energy cost, land cost, timing, changes in regulations, cost of money, etc.?
What are some cost-effective ranges or performance that could be combined into systems that out-perform individual actions?
What is the quantity and value of potable water saved?
Any contribution to combined sewer overflow savings?
Are there incentives, financing, and grants options that might apply?